What are the results of losing a TTAB trademark opposition?
Say you’ve applied for a trademark and everything goes smoothly as your examining attorney approves the mark. So you wait through 30-day period when your trademark is published for opposition and hope no one challenges your mark. Unfortunately, a third party believes your trademark will cause a likelihood of confusion with its registered mark and, therefore, files a Notice of Opposition with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB).
Now, let’s assume after a hard fought battle that the opposer/registrant wins the opposition and the TTAB determines that a likelihood of confusion exists. Would a TTAB trademark loss have any implications beyond the abandonment of the trademark application? What consequences could the TTAB decision have beyond blocking the registration of your mark?
What is issue preclusion or collateral estoppel?
According to the recent U.S. Supreme Court case of B&B Hardware vs. Hargis Indus. (2015), a final decision by the TTAB on a factual or legal issue that was actually litigated can preclude a later ruling by a federal court on that same issue (i.e., “issue preclusion” or “collateral estoppel” in legalese). In B&B Hardware, the issue at stake was likelihood of confusion and so the TTAB’s final determination that it existed would preclude the parties from re-litigating that same issue later in federal court.
Both applicants and registrants will need to weight the pros and cons of pursuing a TTAB trademark opposition, particularly if the determination of an issue such as confusion could possibly end differently in federal court (analysis focuses on use in the marketplace) versus the TTAB (analysis focuses on the marks themselves including the products identified therein).
Why does estoppel or preclusion matter?
Keep in mind that TTAB oppositions do not deal with the issue of a party’s right to use a trademark. TTAB proceedings deal with only the issue of registration. Trademark owners must sue in court, usually at the federal district court level, to stop another party from using a similar mark and to possibly seek money damages.
A prior victory at the TTAB, therefore, can clear a major hurdle in a subsequent litigation focused on the usage of the mark. The flip side of the coin is that a prior TTAB trademark loss can prevent a party from subsequently seeking a different conclusion in court.
Latest posts by Vic Lin (see all)
- China patent law: Are treatments for diseases patentable? - July 16, 2019
- When is the right time to trademark a product or company name? - July 15, 2019
- Rejected trademark specimens: What to do - July 12, 2019