Can a single design patent application include multiple designs?

The short answer is yes, but you may want to think twice before including multiple designs (aka embodiments) in a single design patent application.

However, the risk is that a multi-design applicant may incur greater costs in the long term by attempting to cover multiple designs in a single design application.

What are the benefits of multiple embodiments in a single design patent application?

One factor for consolidating multiple design embodiments into a single filing is to save costs, both in terms of USPTO fees and attorney’s fees. For a small entity, the USPTO initial filing fees for a design patent application amount to $480. Of course, you have to add any attorney’s fees on top of that, so the savings are not trivial.

Design patents do have any renewals or maintenance fees, so there are no additional post-registration savings in terms of having one granted design patent versus multiple design patents.

What are the risks of multiple embodiments in a single design patent application?

The primary risk in a multi-embodiment design patent application is that the patent examiner will find multiple inventions. This means that the examiner thinks the multiple embodiments contain more than one patentably distinct design [see MPEP 1504.05].  Accordingly, the examiner will issue a Restriction Requirement, thereby forcing the applicant to pick a particular embodiment.

Potentially higher costs in the long run

If the examiner sends a Restriction Requirement, the applicant will likely incur the following costs:

  1. Filing a response to pick a particular design (usually attorney’s fees only if filed by the extension-free deadline); and
  2. Filing a divisional application to pursue the non-elected design, which will involve USPTO fees and any attorney’s fees.

Delay in patent grant

Design patent applications in the US have a high allowance rate of approximately 84%. Therefore, there is a strong probability that a single-embodiment design application would proceed from initial filing straight to an allowance without ever receiving an Office Action.

By increasing the probability of an Office Action (i.e., Restriction Requirement) due to multiple designs in a single application, an applicant risks the delay of an allowance on the first design as well as any additional designs.

Abandonment of non-elected designs to public domain

Incorporating multiple embodiments in a single design patent application carries a greater risk of abandonment of the non-elected designs. The Federal Circuit has held that the removal of an embodiment in response to a Restriction Requirement in a design application will lead to abandonment of the non-elected design to the public domain if the applicant does not pursue the non-elected embodiment in a divisional design application.

Therefore, applicants filing a multi-embodiment design application must be prepared to file divisional applications should the examiner issue a Restriction Requirement.

When would a single design application with multiple designs be appropriate?

Prior to filing, the variations between the designs should first be identified. An assessment should then be made on both the significance of those features and the degree of variation between the embodiments.

For example, it may make sense to combine multiple embodiments in a single design application if:

  1. the varying features are not significant to the distinctive ornamental appearance of the overall design; and
  2. the degree of variation between the embodiments are relatively minor.

What is a recommended strategy for US design patent protection of multiple designs?

If the variations are significant to the ornamental appearance of the design or the variations are quite different, it may make more sense to concurrently file multiple design patent applications, each containing a single embodiment. This will avoid a Restriction Requirement, thereby leading a quicker allowance and registration.

The following two tabs change content below.
Vic Lin

Vic Lin

Startup Patent Attorney | IP Chair at Innovation Capital Law Group
We love working with startups and small businesses. I help entrepreneurs protect their intellectual property so they can reach their business goals.
Vic Lin

Latest posts by Vic Lin (see all)