Why would someone oppose your trademark opposition?
The #1 reason a third party would oppose your trademark application is because they believe your mark is too close to theirs. Likelihood of confusion is the most common ground for opposing trademark applications. In such a case, the burden falls on the opposer to show:
- similarities between the respective marks, and
- first use of the mark in commerce, known as priority.
Oppositions might also be filed on grounds of the mark being merely descriptive.
What is an extension of time to oppose?
A potential opposer may request an extension of time to oppose a trademark application. The amount of extended time requested will typically be 30 days or 90 days beyond the original 30-day publication window. Extension requests are routinely granted though a potential opposer must show good cause for a request beyond 30 days (e.g., needs additional time to investigate claim, confer with counsel, discuss settlement or seek counsel for representation).
An extension of time will not always lead to the filing an opposition. The potential opposer could go away on their own or seek settlement that would avoid the need for opposing the trademark application.
Who is the potential opposer?
If you have received notice of an extension of time to oppose, you will be notified of the identity of the potential opposer. This bit of information will allow you to search any registrations and pending applications filed by the potential opposer which might form their case for a likelihood of confusion claim.
TTAB trademark opposition vs. trademark lawsuit: What are the differences?
TTAB proceedings are a kinder, gentler form of litigation. There are no court hearings in TTAB actions, as nearly all matters are handled in writing. The Board does not have authority to impose any monetary sanctions.
Accordingly, TTAB proceedings generally cost significantly less than trademark lawsuits in federal court. Also, the issues in TTAB actions are limited to the registrability of a mark. Infringement is not litigated in TTAB proceedings, though certain underlying issues might serve as the basis for estoppel in a subsequent infringement action in federal court between the same parties.
How much does a TTAB trademark opposition defense cost?
The cost of defending a TTAB opposition will depend upon several factors, but the overwhelming factor will be how far the opposer is willing to go. If the opposer is determined to fight through till the end, then the cost of defending a trademark opposition can range from $50,000 to $150,000.
If both sides are willing to compromise to reach an early settlement that avoids discovery, then opposition defense costs may range from less than $2,000 to $5,000. My firm offers flat rates for TTAB trademark oppositions and cancellations.
What are first steps in defending against a trademark opposition?
If an opposition filed, you will receive the complaint called a Notice of Opposition containing the opposer’s identity, their grounds for opposition and details of their trademark filings which they believe are in conflict with your mark. This will give you an opportunity to assess the likelihood of confusion claim and any potential defenses or counterclaims.
You will also receive a Notice of Institution with a scheduling order setting forth key deadlines, including conference, discovery, disclosure and trial schedule dates. The most immediate deadline for a defendant-applicant is the Time to Answer which is generally 40 days from the filing date of the opposition. The next deadline is for a mandatory discovery conference which is spaced about 1 month after the answer deadline.
What early settlement options might be available?
If the opposer is open to a settlement that would allow your mark to coexist, then it may be worthwhile to explore any potential compromises including:
- amendments to the identification of goods and services, including any exclusionary language
- limitations on usage of your mark, which may include agreements to use your mark only in certain conditions (e.g., with your house mark)
- agreements not to expand into certain product lines
- changes to your mark, which might require filing a new application if the alterations are material
Productive settlement discussions may also lead to a coexistence agreement (aka consent agreement) that either side may file with the USPTO to overcome any refusals based on likelihood of confusion.
Latest posts by Vic Lin (see all)
- How to do marked-up amended claims - January 30, 2019
- Why founders should search trademarks before incorporation - January 8, 2019
- Patenting for startups: Where to begin - January 4, 2019