What is a trademark Office Action?
A trademark Office Action is a letter issued by the USPTO examining attorney reviewing your trademark application (i.e., the trademark examiner). There are generally two types of Office Actions:
- those that refuse registration; and
- those that merely seek clarification.
What are substantive vs. non-substantive trademark Office Actions?
Office Actions that refuse registration are sometimes referred to as substantive Office Actions. Common grounds for rejecting a trademark application include:
- likelihood of confusion over a previously registered mark or prior-pending application; and
- mere descriptiveness.
The risk of a likelihood of confusion rejection may be reduced prior to applying for a mark by conducting a knockout search. The possibility of a merely descriptive rejection can be gauged by an experienced trademark attorney.
A non-substantive Office Action typically requests more information from the client. For example, the examining attorney may seek:
- a disclaimer of a generic term
- amendments to the identification of goods and services
- more information about the products or services identified in the application
- revisions to the description of the mark
- additional USPTO filing fees due to the identification of goods/services covering more classes than what was originally paid
- a clearer image file (JPG) of a logo
- better or additional specimens of use
Deadline for Response
Unlike patent Office Actions, a trademark Office Action sets forth a non-extendable deadline for response that is six months from the date of the action is issued.
Madrid Office Action Response
For Madrid applications under section 66(a), the deadline for response is 6 months from the date the USPTO sent the Office Action to the International Bureau (WIPO), and not the date of notification by WIPO to the holder. A licensed US attorney, and not a patent agent, will be qualified to file a trademark Office Action response with the USPTO.
Office Actions for Madrid Protocol applications typically contain suggested modifications to the identification of goods/services. If the Office Action for a Madrid application does not contain any substantive refusals, then it is fairly straightforward to file a response adopting the examining attorney’s suggested identification. Make sure the blanks as indicated by any [bracketed sections] are sufficiently filled in when supplying a revised identification of goods/services.
How to respond to a non-final Office Action
The first Office Action issued in a trademark application is considered a non-final action. The applicant will have an opportunity to respond to the Office Action. All issues raised in the action should be adequately addressed.
The timing of your Office Action response may involve some strategy worth discussing with your trademark counsel. For example, if your application is rejected on a likelihood of confusion over a registration with a renewal coming due in less than 6 months, it may be worthwhile to check the status of the cited registration to see if a renewal has been filed. If not, it may be prudent to delay the response to avoid a costly legal effort in preparing substantive arguments regarding the absence of likelihood of confusion.
How to respond to a Final Office Action
If the examining attorney is not convinced by the arguments in your response to the non-final Office Action, a Final Office Action will be issued. Final Office Actions are fairly common in applications rejected on the basis of a likelihood of confusion over confusingly similar marks.
Request for Reconsideration
In response to a Final Office Action, the applicant may file a Request for Reconsideration or an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). The Request for Reconsideration may include new issues and new evidence [TMEP 715.03].
Notice of Appeal
If the USPTO trademark examining attorney does not issue a favorable decision in response to the request for reconsideration within 6 months of the date of the Final Office Action, the applicant must file a Notice of Appeal with the TTAB by the 6-month date from the Final Office Action. If a decision on the request for reconsideration has not yet been rendered, the applicant may request suspension of the appeal upon filing the Notice of Appeal. Otherwise, the appeal brief is due 60 days from the filing date of the Notice of Appeal.
In certain situations, it may be appropriate to request suspension of the application if the determination of a particular issue hinges on the outcome of a third party registration or application.
Latest posts by Vic Lin (see all)
- To file an RCE or not? - August 23, 2019
- What product designers and consultants need to know about IP - August 22, 2019
- Japanese PCT Applicants Entering US National Phase: What you need to know - August 20, 2019