What is a PCT prior art search report (written opinion)?

What is a PCT prior art search report?

Patent examiners review PCT applications in the same way that the USPTO examines utility nonprovisional patent applications. In particular, examiners review PCT claims by searching for relevant prior art to determine novelty, nonobviousness and usefulness (utility). The examiner will then summarize findings in a PCT prior art search report.

Keep in mind that the PCT application serves as a placeholder to reserve international patent rights by delaying foreign filing deadlines. While the PCT application itself will not lead to a granted patent, the PCT claims will be reviewed by a patent examiner. The result of the examiner’s review and search of the prior art will lead to at least one PCT search report. The first report is called an International Search Report (ISR) which is issued as a matter of right in each PCT application.

Who conducts the PCT prior art searches?

When a PCT application is filed, the applicant has a choice in selecting the patent office to search the prior art. The applicant chooses the International Search Authority (ISA) by designating the patent office in the initial PCT request. While PCT applicants typically prefer to select their own country’s patent office as the ISA, if available, they may have other options.

For example, PCT applicants originating from China may typically select CNIPA (formerly SIPO) as the International Search Authority while US applicants might prefer the USPTO. Depending upon the subject matter of the technology, savvy PCT applicants may choose certain search authorities in particular countries that might provide the right combination of thorough prior art searches and more favorable claim rulings.

When can you expect the first PCT search report?

The first prior art search report, called an International Search Report (ISR), is routinely issued in each PCT application. If the USPTO is the ISA doing the prior art search, the goal is to send this first prior art search report by 16 months from the priority date. If the PCT application is the first filing and, therefore, lacking a priority claim, then the USPTO’s goal is to issue the International Search Report within 9 months from the PCT filing date.

How can you take advantage of the PCT search report?

The PCT search report is filled with valuable prior art information that you can use to obtain patents in the US and foreign countries. For example, you can file an amendment in your counterpart US application to amend the US claims to be more unique over the prior art found in the PCT search report. If you do not have a counterpart US application, you can file a US national stage application with amended claims that are more novel over the prior art references.

In other words, the PCT search report gives you an earlier glimpse of the prior art that will be cited against your claims. Armed with this information, you can preempt patent rejections by amending your claims before they are searched by an examiner. Amending your claims earlier can save you an Office Action or two.

How to amend PCT claims

In response to a search report, you can amend the PCT claims by filing an Article 19 amendment or an Article 34 Amendment. The difference between the two is that an Article 19 amendment will not result in a subsequent search report. You can file national stage applications based on Article 19 amended claims, but you might not have any opinions on the allowability of such amended claims.

We generally recommend the Article 34 instead since you will get a follow up search report on the amended claims. The Article 34 amendment will typically cost more due to the government fees for the mandatory Chapter II (“two”) demand which must be filed in conjunction with the amendment.

Another option is to amend claims at the national stages. Many foreign countries have a two-step process for patent examination. First, you start by filing a national stage application. Second, you must request examination by a certain deadline after national stage entry. The later deadline for requesting examination gives applicants time to amend claims before they are examined by the local patent office. You can take that time to amend foreign claims to overcome prior art references cited in the PCT application and in any counterpart cases (e.g., US applications).

How useful was this post? (Did you find the information you needed?)

Click on a star to rate it!

Thank you for rating my post!

We want to do better.

Could you tell us what was missing in our post?

Frenda Williams
Frenda Williams
2023-02-21
I have had the pleasure of working with Vic and his team at Innovation Capital Law Group on Trademark creation and contracts. As a solo and non-tech founder, the assistance, guidance and recommendations from Vic and his team have been INVALUABLE. And, with the knowledge that I have a Solid, well versed and caring legal team I can turn to, I have the confidence I need to navigate the intricacies of the tech industry as a solo founder. With that being said, If you’re a startup and you’re looking for a legal team that speaks your language, knows the industry and makes you feel like family…. Innovation Capital Law Group is a Perfect fit for you, your company and your team. Five out of Five Stars… don’t let their brilliance blind you 😁
Shiwei Liu
Shiwei Liu
2023-02-20
Excellent service and quick response. Lots of informative documents on its website.
Chang Chien Michael
Chang Chien Michael
2023-02-20
I have worked with iCap for more than 7 years. I am very glad with his professional knowledge that 7 utility patents were granted by USPTO. Vic and his team are very efficient and knowledgeable. Every time he can transcribe my design idea perfectly in two weeks and file it with no rejection from USPTO. The other service including the granted patent following up is always in time to remind me to take actions. That is why I still stick on iCap as my first priority when I want to file a US patent.
Mats Johansson
Mats Johansson
2023-02-20
We have been happy client for 10+ years. Awesome Patent Law Firm!
Hanson Chang
Hanson Chang
2023-02-16
Glad to write a review for Innovation Capital Law Group. We previously worked with a big law firm (2200 employees) on our patents, and decided to shift over to Innovation Capital. It was a great decision, this team got our patents done faster, more effectively, at a lower cost, and with broader claims. Win all around
Genevieve Springer
Genevieve Springer
2022-09-09
Clear, discernible tools and strategies couched within a business conceived from a genuine interest in doing right by founders.
InPlay Inc
InPlay Inc
2022-06-30
Vic and his team have been providing us with the best patent application experiences we could ever have in our entire career life! Their professionalism and technical knowledge have really saved us a lot of communication effort and time on the applications. Definitely highly recommend if anyone is looking for help with IP protection for their business.
Meg Crowley
Meg Crowley
2022-03-05
After working with Vic and his team at Innovation Capital Law Group, our organization is confident our trademarks were solid and protected. Thank you team.
Andy Dong
Andy Dong
2022-02-28
I have been using Innovation Capital Law Group for a few years and continue to use them. They have provided an excellent services on our legal issues including intellectual properties and patents . They are very responsive, easy to work with and very competent . I highly recommend them.

Follow us

Copyright © Vic Lin 2023