What are acceptable trademark clothing specimens of use?

What kinds of trademark clothing specimens are acceptable?

An acceptable specimen of use for trademark application covering clothing items can be especially tricky. USPTO trademark examining attorneys want to see the mark in certain areas for articles of clothing that might not be obvious. Merely showing the mark on the front of the clothing item may lead to a rejection called an ornamental refusal. Keep in mind this peculiar rule when submitting trademark clothing specimens of use.

What is an ornamental refusal?

A specimen for a clothing item may be rejected for consisting of an ornamental display or feature of the mark. For example, submitting a specimen showing the mark on the front of a T-shirt or hat may result in an ornamental refusal. An ornamental refusal occurs when the USPTO believes the mark shown on the clothing item serves an ornamental purpose (e.g., looking good) and fails to identify the source of the goods.

If the mark is shown in a smaller size on the pocket or breast portion, such a shirt or other clothing top might be acceptable as a clothing specimen. Various factors come into play such as the size and dominance of the mark, as well as the location on the clothing item.

Where should the mark be displayed?

For clothing tops, the mark should be displayed on inner tags such as tags around the neck opening. If your clothing items are tagless, it may help to display the mark on the inner surface of the clothing top.

If your clothing product uses a hangtag, then it would certainly help to show the mark on the hangtag.

How to reduce risk of rejection of clothing specimens

There are certain strategies to reduce or minimize the risk of a rejection of your clothing specimens in your trademark application. At the outset, consider filing an Intent-To-Use (ITU) application if you suspect that your current examples of usage may be insufficient or potentially defective. An ITU avoids the need to submit specimens upfront, and provides the applicant with flexibility to identify a variety of clothing items that have not yet been sold.

If and when you do file a use-based application, then try to submit multiple specimens of clothing items where the mark is not being shown in an ornamental or fashion manner. That way, if certain specimens are rejected, you will have at least one backup specimen which will hopefully be accepted. You only need to submit one acceptable specimen for Class 25.

How useful was this post? (Did you find the information you needed?)

Click on a star to rate it!

Thank you for rating my post!

We want to do better.

Could you tell us what was missing in our post?

Frenda Williams
Frenda Williams
2023-02-21
I have had the pleasure of working with Vic and his team at Innovation Capital Law Group on Trademark creation and contracts. As a solo and non-tech founder, the assistance, guidance and recommendations from Vic and his team have been INVALUABLE. And, with the knowledge that I have a Solid, well versed and caring legal team I can turn to, I have the confidence I need to navigate the intricacies of the tech industry as a solo founder. With that being said, If you’re a startup and you’re looking for a legal team that speaks your language, knows the industry and makes you feel like family…. Innovation Capital Law Group is a Perfect fit for you, your company and your team. Five out of Five Stars… don’t let their brilliance blind you 😁
Shiwei Liu
Shiwei Liu
2023-02-20
Excellent service and quick response. Lots of informative documents on its website.
Chang Chien Michael
Chang Chien Michael
2023-02-20
I have worked with iCap for more than 7 years. I am very glad with his professional knowledge that 7 utility patents were granted by USPTO. Vic and his team are very efficient and knowledgeable. Every time he can transcribe my design idea perfectly in two weeks and file it with no rejection from USPTO. The other service including the granted patent following up is always in time to remind me to take actions. That is why I still stick on iCap as my first priority when I want to file a US patent.
Mats Johansson
Mats Johansson
2023-02-20
We have been happy client for 10+ years. Awesome Patent Law Firm!
Hanson Chang
Hanson Chang
2023-02-16
Glad to write a review for Innovation Capital Law Group. We previously worked with a big law firm (2200 employees) on our patents, and decided to shift over to Innovation Capital. It was a great decision, this team got our patents done faster, more effectively, at a lower cost, and with broader claims. Win all around
Genevieve Springer
Genevieve Springer
2022-09-09
Clear, discernible tools and strategies couched within a business conceived from a genuine interest in doing right by founders.
InPlay Inc
InPlay Inc
2022-06-30
Vic and his team have been providing us with the best patent application experiences we could ever have in our entire career life! Their professionalism and technical knowledge have really saved us a lot of communication effort and time on the applications. Definitely highly recommend if anyone is looking for help with IP protection for their business.
Meg Crowley
Meg Crowley
2022-03-05
After working with Vic and his team at Innovation Capital Law Group, our organization is confident our trademarks were solid and protected. Thank you team.
Andy Dong
Andy Dong
2022-02-28
I have been using Innovation Capital Law Group for a few years and continue to use them. They have provided an excellent services on our legal issues including intellectual properties and patents . They are very responsive, easy to work with and very competent . I highly recommend them.

Follow us

Copyright © Vic Lin 2023