Not trademarkable: What can’t be trademarked?

What is trademarkable?

To be trademarkable means that a word or phrase is capable of trademark registration. That is to say, a mark must meet certain requirements to be registrable with the USPTO. Not all words can be trademarked. In order for a term to function as a mark and thus qualify for registration, a mark must serve as an indicator of the source of origin of the relevant goods or services. If certain words or phrases fail to distinguish the source of goods/services from those of another, then such wording would be incapable of trademark registration.

Critical question to be trademarkable

The key question analyzed by the USPTO is “. . . how the designation would be perceived by the relevant public.” This inquiry involves looking into the meaning of the word(s) and the context of use.

Not trademarkable: informational matter

Here are some examples of informational matter incapable of being trademarked.

Merely conveying information about goods/services

A refusal based on the mark merely conveying information about the goods or services is somewhat similar to a rejection based on mere descriptiveness except for one key distinction: merely descriptive rejections might be overcome with evidence of acquired distinctiveness. Since acquired distinctiveness is not an option for overcoming a refusal based on merely conveying information, such a refusal is almost like a rejection based on a generic mark.


  • FRAGILE for labels and bumper stickers
  • GUARANTEED STARTING for motor vehicle services
  • HOURS OF ENERGY NOW for dietary supplements
  • UNLIMITED CARRYOVER for telecommunication services
  • INVESTING IN AMERICAN JOBS for promoting public awareness of certain goods, and for various retail and online store services in Class 35

Widely used messages

This refusal applies to commonly used phrases and expressions that may be social, political, religious, or simply commonplace. A popular motto may carry a high risk of refusal under this particular category.


  • Occupy [Wall Street / DC / Congress / you name it]

Direct religious quotes, passages, citations

Bible passages and other religious texts may be considered as incapable of indicating source. The wording must be direct quote in order to be rejected on this basis. If the mark is not a direct quote, it may be rejected on other grounds, such as a widely used message.

What is a failure-to-function-as-a-mark refusal?

A refusal on the grounds that a mark fails to function as a trademark means means that the examining attorney believes the applied-for mark fails to indicate the source of goods or services. Such a refusal may be applied to informational matter as detailed above as well to marks which appear ornamental or convey a thought or emotion.

How to respond to a failure-to-function refusal

If a trademark application is refused on grounds that the mark is incapable of indicating source, then an applicant will not be able to prevail over the rejection with evidence of acquired distinctiveness. The Supplemental Register would not be available for matter that fails to function as a mark.

Instead, a proper response should include evidence that the relevant consumers would recognize the mark as a source indicator (e.g., brand) that distinguishes the applicant’s goods from competitors.

If a mark contains other registrable wording, then the examining attorney may require a disclaimer of the incapable matter.

Trademarking strategies

A cost-effective strategy for registering trademarks should anticipate these potential refusals early on. While USPTO refusals can be subjective and difficult to predict, it may make sense to pivot to a different mark before investing in a trademark application and developing a brand.

Even if you are successful in registering a commonly used term, it may be costly to maintain exclusivity as others seek to use the same mark in promoting their products. Monitoring and opposing third party applications for similar marks can be a very expensive and unending commitment.

Need help with registering your trademark?

Reach out to patent and trademark attorney Vic Lin at or call (949) 223-9623. Let’s figure out which patent filing makes the most sense and take the next step to protect your innovation.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Thank you for rating my post!

We want to do better.

Could you tell us what was missing in our post?

Innovation Capital Law Group
Ready to Slay Goliath?

What IP do you need?*

What IP do you need?*

(Check all that apply)

Your Name*

Your Name*

Your Email*

Your Email*

Your Phone Number

Your Phone Number

Design Patent Money-Back Guarantee
Get your design patent allowed or attorney's fees refunded. Call or email Vic to see if your design qualifies.

Not sure where to start? Email Vic at

Copyright © Vic Lin 2023