Final Trademark Rejection: How to Respond to a Trademark Final Office Action

What is a final trademark rejection or Final Office Action?

Known as a Final Office Action, a final trademark rejection is typically a second rejection of a trademark application following the applicant’s response to the first rejection. A Final Office Action will contain the same grounds asserted in the Non-final Office Action. This second refusal on the same grounds usually occurs when an USPTO trademark examining attorney remains unpersuaded after reviewing a response to the first Office Action where the refusal was introduced.

For example, you may receive a first (non-final) Office Action containing a refusal based on certain grounds, such as likelihood of confusion, merely descriptive mark, or failure-to-function as trademark. You file a response to this non-final Office Action with arguments, and possibly amendments. If the examining attorney is not persuaded by your Office Action response, a final trademark rejection will be issued in the form of a Final Office Action.

If you would like a flat rate estimate for a response to your trademark refusal, please email me a copy of your Office Action.

What are your options in responding to a final trademark refusal?

An applicant has a few options in response to a Final Office Action:

  1. File a Request for Reconsideration;
  2. Appeal;
  3. Petition to Cancel the blocking trademark registration(s);
  4. Coexistence agreement with the trademark registration owner(s);
  5. File an expungement or reexamination to remove the blocking registered trademark; or
  6. Combinations of the above.

Let’s briefly explore these ways to respond to a final trademark refusal.

What is a Request for Reconsideration, and when should you file it?

A Request for Reconsideration is basically a response to a Final Office Action that contains arguments and possibly amendments. Such an option makes more sense when you have new evidence for the examining attorney to consider. For example, you might consider an amendment to your identification of goods that removes certain items that overlap with or relate to goods in cited registrations. If you’re dealing with merely descriptive refusal, you might find some new evidence to show how consumers would not find your mark to be descriptive of a characteristic of your product or service.

What you should not do is file a Request for Reconsideration that merely repeats the same arguments. A response that simply rehashes previously made arguments without any new information is bound for failure.

Should you appeal a final trademark rejection?

Available only after receiving a second refusal on the same grounds, an appeal may make sense when you have no new evidence or amendments to provide. The appeal process starts by first filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee within 6 months from the date of the Final Office Action. An appeal brief with the USPTO appeal brief fee is due within 60 days of the date of the appeal.

To give yourself more time, one option is to file the notice of appeal towards the end of the 6-month deadline triggered by the Final Office Action. Thereafter, you would have about 2 months to file the appeal brief.

Can you file both a Request for Reconsideration and an appeal concurrently?

Yes, an applicant can file both a Request for Reconsideration and an appeal. In terms of timing, it would be preferable to file the Request for Reconsideration earlier within the 6-month response period to see if a favorable result would occur prior to the expiration of the 6-month deadline. If you wait too long and file a Request for Reconsideration near the 6-month FOA deadline, the USPTO might not issue a decision on your reconsideration request in time. Filing the reconsideration request earlier gives you leeway to see if an appeal would still be required.

How should you respond to a Final Office Action if the 6-month deadline is quickly approaching?

Suppose you filed a Request for Reconsideration and the refusal has not yet been withdrawn while the 6-month deadline from the Final Office Action is quickly approaching. You can file the Notice of Appeal at or near the deadline. You will then have 60 days thereafter to file your appeal brief.

If you have not yet filed any response to a final refusal, you may simultaneously file a Request for Reconsideration and a Notice of Appeal, and suspend the appeal process while waiting for a decision on your reconsideration request.

You can request a suspension of your appeal pending the outcome of the reconsideration decision and request that the application be remanded to the trademark examining attorney. This will delay the appeal brief deadline and possibly save you money from having to prepare an appeal brief if the reconsideration decision is favorable.

What if you want to cancel the blocking cited registration?

You might be able to file Petition to Cancel the blocking registration(s) if your grounds for cancellation are timely. For example, a cancellation based on your earlier use (i.e., priority) is only available against registration less than 5 years old. If you petition to cancel the cited registration, you may request to suspend your trademark application pending the outcome of the cancellation proceeding.

If the registration owner (registrant) fails to answer the petition, the trademark registration will be canceled. If the registrant submits an answer, you might still to be able to pursue certain results that do not require litigating the case to the end. For example, the parties might be able to negotiate a friendly coexistence by signing a consent agreement.

Can you pursue a consent agreement with the registration owner without filing a cancellation?

Sure, if you have enough time remaining in your Office Action deadline. Practically, you may be compelled to file a cancellation for at least a few reasons. The registration owner may be unresponsive to friendly communications. Also, the USPTO will not suspend outstanding deadlines based on amicable attempts to seek coexistence with registrations owners. A filed cancellation proceeding, on the other hand, would be a sufficient reason to suspend a trademark application.

Need to respond to a final trademark rejection?

Contact patent and trademark attorney Vic Lin by email or call (949) 223-9623 to see how we can help you prevail over a trademark refusal.

How useful was this post? (Did you find the information you needed?)

Click on a star to rate it!

Thank you for rating my post!

We want to do better.

Could you tell us what was missing in our post?

Frenda Williams
Frenda Williams
I have had the pleasure of working with Vic and his team at Innovation Capital Law Group on Trademark creation and contracts. As a solo and non-tech founder, the assistance, guidance and recommendations from Vic and his team have been INVALUABLE. And, with the knowledge that I have a Solid, well versed and caring legal team I can turn to, I have the confidence I need to navigate the intricacies of the tech industry as a solo founder. With that being said, If you’re a startup and you’re looking for a legal team that speaks your language, knows the industry and makes you feel like family…. Innovation Capital Law Group is a Perfect fit for you, your company and your team. Five out of Five Stars… don’t let their brilliance blind you 😁
Shiwei Liu
Shiwei Liu
Excellent service and quick response. Lots of informative documents on its website.
Chang Chien Michael
Chang Chien Michael
I have worked with iCap for more than 7 years. I am very glad with his professional knowledge that 7 utility patents were granted by USPTO. Vic and his team are very efficient and knowledgeable. Every time he can transcribe my design idea perfectly in two weeks and file it with no rejection from USPTO. The other service including the granted patent following up is always in time to remind me to take actions. That is why I still stick on iCap as my first priority when I want to file a US patent.
Mats Johansson
Mats Johansson
We have been happy client for 10+ years. Awesome Patent Law Firm!
Hanson Chang
Hanson Chang
Glad to write a review for Innovation Capital Law Group. We previously worked with a big law firm (2200 employees) on our patents, and decided to shift over to Innovation Capital. It was a great decision, this team got our patents done faster, more effectively, at a lower cost, and with broader claims. Win all around
Genevieve Springer
Genevieve Springer
Clear, discernible tools and strategies couched within a business conceived from a genuine interest in doing right by founders.
InPlay Inc
InPlay Inc
Vic and his team have been providing us with the best patent application experiences we could ever have in our entire career life! Their professionalism and technical knowledge have really saved us a lot of communication effort and time on the applications. Definitely highly recommend if anyone is looking for help with IP protection for their business.
Meg Crowley
Meg Crowley
After working with Vic and his team at Innovation Capital Law Group, our organization is confident our trademarks were solid and protected. Thank you team.
Andy Dong
Andy Dong
I have been using Innovation Capital Law Group for a few years and continue to use them. They have provided an excellent services on our legal issues including intellectual properties and patents . They are very responsive, easy to work with and very competent . I highly recommend them.

Follow us

Copyright © Vic Lin 2023