What are differences between patents and trademarks?

How are patents and trademarks different?

The goal of this article is to provide a helpful summary of differences between patents and trademarks that will actually help you in making good business decisions. This is not an exhaustive list of differences. Instead, we will focus on key distinguishing features of each IP right. My hope is that you can then formulate and implement a smart IP strategy. The USPTO has a helpful basic summary on the differences between patents, trademarks and copyrights.

Timing difference between filing patents and trademarks

Patents are time sensitive. You have a limited amount of time to apply for patents before your patent rights may be lost forever. With foreign patents, you may be disqualified simply for publicly disclosing your invention before securing a patent filing date. In the US, you have a 1-year grace period to file a patent application for a publicly disclosed invention.

Trademarks do not have such deadlines. You could have been using a trademark for years before applying for registration. However, there may be procedural and substantive disadvantages in delaying your trademark application, especially if someone else’s registration for a similar mark is over 5 years old.

There is one timing similarity between patent and trademark filings: being the first to file has significant advantages.

Usage difference between patents and trademarks

Trademarks generally require continuous use in order maintain rights. This is true of both registered marks and unregistered common law trademarks. Failure to use a mark continuously can lead to a loss of trademark rights known as abandonment.

Patents do not require usage in order to maintain rights. Utility patents simply require a series of maintenance fees to be timely paid during certain anniversaries following the grant date. Design patents have no maintenance fees. Whether or not a patent owner actually uses their patent will not affect the validity of their patent rights.

Expiration difference between patents and trademarks

Patents have a definite and limited term. Design patents expire 15 years from the date of grant. Utility patents may last up to 20 years from the filing date provided that the three maintenance fees are timely paid in sequence.

Trademark rights may last indefinitely so as the owner continues using the mark. As long as the trademark owner satisfies post-registration requirements and fees, a trademark registration need not expire.

How the patent process differs from the trademark registration process

For a utility patent, the process from initial filing to patent grant is long, expensive and full or uncertainty. A design patent is generally quicker and easier to obtain. A patentability search can identify prior art that may be used to reject the novelty of an invention. A prior art search, however thorough, might not adequately predict how examiners will combine multiple references to reject your claims as being obvious.

Trademark applications generally have greater certainty than utility patent applications, especially if a knockout search is performed prior to filing. A knockout search can identify confusingly similar trademarks and help the applicant pivot to a different mark.

How do patent costs compare to trademark costs?

Flat rates for procuring IP have been around for years. Trademarks are more conducive to fixed fees due to greater certainty in the registration process. Utility patent applications have substantially greater complexity, more uncertainty, longer USPTO wait times, higher number of rejections. Generally, utility patents are significantly more challenging path to obtain.

At our firm, a utility patent may cost 7 to 15 times more than a trademark registration. For example, a trademark registration at our firm starts at $1,000 for a single class of goods or services.

How useful was this post? (Did you find the information you needed?)

Click on a star to rate it!

Thank you for rating my post!

We want to do better.

Could you tell us what was missing in our post?

Frenda Williams
Frenda Williams
2023-02-21
I have had the pleasure of working with Vic and his team at Innovation Capital Law Group on Trademark creation and contracts. As a solo and non-tech founder, the assistance, guidance and recommendations from Vic and his team have been INVALUABLE. And, with the knowledge that I have a Solid, well versed and caring legal team I can turn to, I have the confidence I need to navigate the intricacies of the tech industry as a solo founder. With that being said, If you’re a startup and you’re looking for a legal team that speaks your language, knows the industry and makes you feel like family…. Innovation Capital Law Group is a Perfect fit for you, your company and your team. Five out of Five Stars… don’t let their brilliance blind you 😁
Shiwei Liu
Shiwei Liu
2023-02-20
Excellent service and quick response. Lots of informative documents on its website.
Chang Chien Michael
Chang Chien Michael
2023-02-20
I have worked with iCap for more than 7 years. I am very glad with his professional knowledge that 7 utility patents were granted by USPTO. Vic and his team are very efficient and knowledgeable. Every time he can transcribe my design idea perfectly in two weeks and file it with no rejection from USPTO. The other service including the granted patent following up is always in time to remind me to take actions. That is why I still stick on iCap as my first priority when I want to file a US patent.
Mats Johansson
Mats Johansson
2023-02-20
We have been happy client for 10+ years. Awesome Patent Law Firm!
Hanson Chang
Hanson Chang
2023-02-16
Glad to write a review for Innovation Capital Law Group. We previously worked with a big law firm (2200 employees) on our patents, and decided to shift over to Innovation Capital. It was a great decision, this team got our patents done faster, more effectively, at a lower cost, and with broader claims. Win all around
Genevieve Springer
Genevieve Springer
2022-09-09
Clear, discernible tools and strategies couched within a business conceived from a genuine interest in doing right by founders.
InPlay Inc
InPlay Inc
2022-06-30
Vic and his team have been providing us with the best patent application experiences we could ever have in our entire career life! Their professionalism and technical knowledge have really saved us a lot of communication effort and time on the applications. Definitely highly recommend if anyone is looking for help with IP protection for their business.
Meg Crowley
Meg Crowley
2022-03-05
After working with Vic and his team at Innovation Capital Law Group, our organization is confident our trademarks were solid and protected. Thank you team.
Andy Dong
Andy Dong
2022-02-28
I have been using Innovation Capital Law Group for a few years and continue to use them. They have provided an excellent services on our legal issues including intellectual properties and patents . They are very responsive, easy to work with and very competent . I highly recommend them.

Follow us

Copyright © Vic Lin 2023