Design Patents vs. Utility Patents: What are the differences?

Design Patents vs. Utility Patents

Design patent or utility patent? This is a critical question that you need to resolve early in your patent journey. The essential distinction between design and utility patents is the difference in protecting “How it looks” (design) vs. “How it works” (utility). If you’re concerned about competitors copying the appearance of your concept, then apply for a design patent. If you want to protect the functional features of your concept, then apply for a utility patent. In some cases, it may be appropriate to file both design and utility patent applications.

Need help filing a design patent or utility patent? Contact Vic at or call (949) 223-9623 to see how we can help you protect your innovation with the right patents.

Design patent protection would be appropriate for three-dimensional shapes and two-dimensional product designs. If your product has a visual feature that simply looks cool or different, and serves no functional purposes, a design patent application may be the way to go.

Design patents are meant to protect only nonfunctional, ornamental features. But that does not mean a functional product is ineligible for protection. This is where consulting with a patent attorney would help.

Here’s a table summarizing differences between design and utility patents:

Design PatentUtility Patent   (nonprovisional)
ProtectsHow it looksHow it works
Attorney’s fees for initial filingless than $1,000more than $7,000
Allowance rate / Office Action rejections86.4% allowance
(7 out of 8 allowed)
90% rejection (1st OA),
followed by 50% chance of 2nd OA
How much time does it take? (average pendency to issuance or abandonment)20 months33 months
Total cost (for small entity)$2,500 to $3,000 >$10K
Patent term15 years from grant date20 years from filing date
How to determine infringement (point of reference)drawingswritten claims
Comparison Table: Design Patents vs. Utility Patents

Cost Differences: Design patents vs. Utility Patents

As shown above, the cost of a design patent is fraction of that of a utility patent application which can easily get into the tens of thousands from start to finish. Two primary factors lead to the higher costs of filing utility patent applications:

  1. The initial filing of a utility patent application requires greater effort in drafting the specification and claims; and
  2. Ongoing Office Action rejections, each requiring a thorough written response.

What are the differences in protection between design patents and utility patents?

Claim Scope

Since a design patent covers merely the ornamental appearance of an invention, it’s not difficult to imagine the ways in which a competitor may easily design around a patented design by creating a product that simply looks different.

Utility patents are tougher to design around. Since utility patents claim the function or structure of an invention, the outer appearance of a product is less relevant to issue of infringement. A competitor may introduce a product with a very different appearance from that of a patented product and still infringe a utility patent.

How to determine infringement

To infringe a design patent, you need to do a side-by-side visual comparison of the design patent drawings with the accused product. The question is whether the two designs would look substantially similar in the eye of an ordinary observer. Would the resemblance deceive observers, inducing them to purchase one supposing it to be the other?

To infringe a utility patent, you must look to the patent claims and determine if each claim element is found in the accused product.

What are the different probabilities of Patent Office rejections?

Utility applications have a significantly higher rate of initial rejection (approx. 80-90%). In contrast, design applications may often receive a “first action allowance” which is an approval without any rejections. This is due in part to the differences in the claimed subject matter. Whereas the claim in a design application is primarily visual and more limited in scope, the claims in a utility application are textual and generally broader in scope. Broader claims have a higher probability of being rejected over prior art that discloses the claimed subject matter.

What are the different lengths of the patent application process?

It takes much more time to get a utility patent than a design patent. Since utility applications have a higher rate of rejection, they also endure a longer application process (average: approximately 3 years) than that of a design application (average: approximately 1.5 years).

What are differences in expiration dates between design patents and utility patents?

Design patents expire 15 years from the issue date and require no renewal payments. Utility patents generally expire 20 years from the filing date if the three required maintenance fees are timely paid. A utility patent can expire earlier than the 20-year date if a particular maintenance fee is not timely paid. Keep in mind that any expired patents will still count as prior art for patentability purposes.

Need to file a utility or design patent application? Not sure which to file?

Contact US patent attorney Vic Lin via email or call (949) 223-9623 to find out which type of patent application would best protect your innovation. We can provide flat rate estimates for filing your patent application.

If you’ve found this post helpful, check out our best IP resources.

Want to learn more about design patents and utility patents?

How useful was this post? (Did you find the information you needed?)

Click on a star to rate it!

Thank you for rating my post!

We want to do better.

Could you tell us what was missing in our post?

Frenda Williams
Frenda Williams
I have had the pleasure of working with Vic and his team at Innovation Capital Law Group on Trademark creation and contracts. As a solo and non-tech founder, the assistance, guidance and recommendations from Vic and his team have been INVALUABLE. And, with the knowledge that I have a Solid, well versed and caring legal team I can turn to, I have the confidence I need to navigate the intricacies of the tech industry as a solo founder. With that being said, If you’re a startup and you’re looking for a legal team that speaks your language, knows the industry and makes you feel like family…. Innovation Capital Law Group is a Perfect fit for you, your company and your team. Five out of Five Stars… don’t let their brilliance blind you 😁
Shiwei Liu
Shiwei Liu
Excellent service and quick response. Lots of informative documents on its website.
Chang Chien Michael
Chang Chien Michael
I have worked with iCap for more than 7 years. I am very glad with his professional knowledge that 7 utility patents were granted by USPTO. Vic and his team are very efficient and knowledgeable. Every time he can transcribe my design idea perfectly in two weeks and file it with no rejection from USPTO. The other service including the granted patent following up is always in time to remind me to take actions. That is why I still stick on iCap as my first priority when I want to file a US patent.
Mats Johansson
Mats Johansson
We have been happy client for 10+ years. Awesome Patent Law Firm!
Hanson Chang
Hanson Chang
Glad to write a review for Innovation Capital Law Group. We previously worked with a big law firm (2200 employees) on our patents, and decided to shift over to Innovation Capital. It was a great decision, this team got our patents done faster, more effectively, at a lower cost, and with broader claims. Win all around
Genevieve Springer
Genevieve Springer
Clear, discernible tools and strategies couched within a business conceived from a genuine interest in doing right by founders.
InPlay Inc
InPlay Inc
Vic and his team have been providing us with the best patent application experiences we could ever have in our entire career life! Their professionalism and technical knowledge have really saved us a lot of communication effort and time on the applications. Definitely highly recommend if anyone is looking for help with IP protection for their business.
Meg Crowley
Meg Crowley
After working with Vic and his team at Innovation Capital Law Group, our organization is confident our trademarks were solid and protected. Thank you team.
Andy Dong
Andy Dong
I have been using Innovation Capital Law Group for a few years and continue to use them. They have provided an excellent services on our legal issues including intellectual properties and patents . They are very responsive, easy to work with and very competent . I highly recommend them.

Follow us

Copyright © Vic Lin 2023